conducting performance reviews

Performance review processes and timelines can vary significantly based on the company. Over the years, some companies have tried to make the performance review process more fair. Some have implemented peer review processes or other means of providing a 360-degree view of every employee. Instead of your direct manager being the only person to provide a review of your performance, you can ask your peers or others to provide input for you. Companies have tried to cut down on the amount of time the process takes up by removing layers of evaluation, including levels of “laddering” meetings where managers gather to sequentially rank every employee at a given level. There’s still a lot to be debated about the fairness of different approaches to evaluating employee performance. 

As a manager, you will be involved in the performance review process by coaching your direct reports and evaluating their performance. Regardless of the details, timelines, and people involved, most companies include these common elements in performance reviews:

  1. Employee Goals – Every employee creates performance goals for the given performance time period. In some companies, these could be yearly goals, in other companies, they might be shorter-term goals to be completed in the quarter or half-year. Many companies will encourage you to write SMART goals.
  2. Employee Self Input – Every employee provides input to their goals and their performance. This input is encouraged to include progress on goals, if the goals were achieved, and any other noteworthy achievements. 
  3. Manager Input and Review – Managers review the Employee Goals and Employee Self Input, and then provide their input. This input might be a summary of the employee’s overall performance, or it might be goal-by-goal input in response to the Employee Self Input. There may also be a rating component to the Manager’s Input, ranking the employee’s performance on a defined scale. There is usually a formal meeting scheduled with each direct report for the Manager Review.

As the team lead, you should take steps to ensure you are committing time to this process in both the preparation and the execution. Before the process begins, you should know the logistics: what is due and when, who is involved in the process, and how decisions are made regarding promotions, pay increases, or bonuses. This will help you communicate this information to your team, ensure they meet all deadlines, and answer their questions as they go through the process. You should also understand what the company values and rewards when it comes to evaluating performance reviews. This will help ensure you and your team are giving the best possible effort to be competitive in the performance review process. You are responsible for how well your team does and what value they find in this process.

Here are some specific actions you can take as a manager when executing your tasks as team lead in the performance review process:

Coach your team on writing goals and self-input

Start by sharing all of the information you gather about performance factors with your team. You should have the best understanding as their manager for what performance factors and achievements are being emphasized by the organization for career advancement or formal promotion. Some companies have this defined and published somewhere. If there are performance factors per level that are available for employees, share the information with your team. Other companies will vary performance factors depending on the most up-to-date business strategy for the company. Learn this information and talk through these factors with your team.

This information should then inform on how your team writes their performance goals and completes their self-input. (This information should also inform how you position your team for new opportunities in the company.) The performance goals for the year should focus on growth and improvement while targeting the factors that the company will reward and value. 

Be deliberate with written manager input

When it comes time for you to provide written manager input to your employee’s performance review, you should prioritize this task knowing what you write may be the deciding factor in their future career opportunities. Although that may seem melodramatic, when you approach this task with that level of seriousness, it elevates the importance and priority. This task is part of your managerial responsibilities as much as your daily project work.

Like your employee’s self-input, make sure you also highlight the performance factors the company rewards and values, especially if you’re trying to get someone promoted or recognized. Your input, positive or negative, should be actionable and specific, with metrics if possible. Point to key achievements or events with detail. Don’t be vague. 

If your employee needs improvement or professional development, your written feedback should detail specifically what to do to improve or change. As much detail as possible (with follow-up throughout the year) will ensure your input is taken to heart.

If you need to give a negative performance review, you have to back it up with evidence. It cannot be vague, it cannot be weighted inappropriately compared to other areas, and it cannot be a “feeling” that causes you to give a lower rating. Negative performance has to be factual, specific, and related to your business. There should be actions for improvement recorded in your feedback. 

Remember that the written manager feedback in an employee’s yearly performance review should never be the first time an employee is hearing negative feedback. By the time negative feedback is recorded in a performance review, there should have been several conversations related to poor performance and improvement plans. This is your responsibility as their manager.

Make manager review meetings worthwhile

An often-heard complaint is that both managers and employees see performance review meetings as a waste of time. It is up to you as the manager to make the time spent in these meetings worthwhile. (Don’t go around wasting your own time!) Unless you have an extremely eager employee who will take control of the conversation, you are responsible for the outcome and the environment created during this time. 

Approach this meeting with an attitude of care, reflection, and coaching. If you want your employees to succeed and you are earnestly giving them feedback to succeed, this will be a genuine conversation. If it is appropriate to your work environment, you should hold the conversation in person or over a video call. If this is not possible, a phone call should occur. This should be a live, spoken conversation that does not take place over direct message or email.

Review or restate the entire performance review process for the company. Then talk through your performance input for them and the rating you gave them.

If you are tasked with delivering a performance review outcome, such as if they were promoted or not, learn the reasoning for that outcome so you can answer questions they might have about it. Remember to approach this news with sensitivity.

Be honest when answering questions about the process or the outcome. This conversation defines this person’s role at the company and their livelihood, and it is important to give them the care and consideration this conversation deserves.

These suggestions and examples take some assumptions into account, but they can be tailored to your industry and your role as a manager in the performance review process. As long as you remember to be honest and caring with the best interest of your direct reports in mind when having performance-related conversations, you’ll make the process worthwhile for yourself and your team.

Comments

Leave a comment